國共串通偽造開羅宣言欺世竊台

中國說開羅宣言是台灣問題的由來 2004年3月6日中國外交部長答覆記者時說，「記者是傳播資訊和知識的，如果說有的朋友還不清楚台灣問題的由來，我建議我們一塊再學習一下有關的歷史文件，比如說1943年的開羅宣言、1945年的波茨坦公告、1971年的聯大第2758號決議以及同中國建交的160多個國家同我們發表的建交公報。所有這些文件都清晰地、準確無誤地承認世界上只有一個中國，台灣是中國的一部分」。3月14日中國國務院總理溫家寶在記者會上再說了一遍。

但我們研究發現，(1)聯大2758號決議並末承認台灣是中國的一部分；(2)世上雖有國家承認台灣是中國一部分，但那只是1938年慕尼黑協定出賣捷克的現代版，目的在出賣台灣換取利益沒有法律根據。(3)波茨坦公告所提及的開羅宣言並末把台灣交給中國，事實如下：

▲中國利用開羅宣言干涉台灣內政，是中國問題不是台灣問題：

1945年9月2日，日本正式投降，降書載明接受中美英3國在波茨坦發佈的宣言條款，一般稱為波茨坦宣言(中國稱波茨坦公告)，其第8條條文為「開羅宣言之協議(terms)必須實施，而日本之主權，必將限於本州、北海道、九州、四國及吾人所決定其他小島之內」。但全世界找不到開羅宣言，故波茨坦宣言中「開羅宣言之協議必須實施」究何含意尚無法確定。但中國堅稱，1943年12月1日羅斯福、邱吉爾、蔣介石在開羅發表的新聞公報就是開羅宣言(見附件1)，公報上記載滿洲台澎歸還中國，所以台灣是中國的一部分。在此就來檢驗是否如此。

▲中國版的開羅宣言(新聞公報)係偽造，台灣問題根本不存在，就算存在也解決了！

1. 不是宣言：新聞公報有「滿洲、台灣、澎湖歸還中華民國」字樣。但新聞公報的標題只是新聞公報不是開羅宣言，波茨坦宣言要實施的是開羅宣言不是新聞公報。

2. 無人簽字：新聞公報原稿上羅斯福、邱吉爾、蔣介石無一人簽字(見附件1)。

3. 與會者不在場：新聞公報原稿沒有發佈的時間和地點，但中國稱公報於1943年12月1 日由「3巨頭」在開羅發佈，但當時羅斯福、邱吉爾在德黑蘭和史達林開會(見附件2)，而蔣介石已回到中國重慶(見附件3)。由此可證 1943年12月1日「3巨頭」均不在開羅，亦未在新聞公報上簽字，證明不是他們所發佈。

4. 無承諾：新聞公報雖刊有「滿洲、台澎歸還中華民國」字樣，但1955年2月1日邱吉爾在英國國會答覆質詢時否認開羅宣言有此承諾(見附件4)。

5. 全盤否定：中國版的開羅宣言亦稱將把滿洲(指旅順、大連)給中華民國。但1945年2月11日羅斯福、邱吉爾在雅爾達秘約簽字，承認旅順、大連給蘇聯，全盤否定中國所說「開羅宣言承諾把滿洲、台灣、澎湖劃給中華民國」(見附件5)。

6. 結論：中國共產黨和國民黨串通，偽造開羅宣言愚弄記者矇騙世界，企圖永遠竊據台灣。

▲台灣法理獨立，地位和美國、日本、英國、德國、法國、中國相等：

1. 從日本分離後，台灣地位適用聯合國憲章(1945年6月26日簽字同年生效)依法獨立。

憲章第77條b：國際託管制度適用於因二次大戰結束，或自敵國分離的領土，

第76條b：託管的基本目標為託管領土的自治、獨立。

2. 1952年4月28日舊金山和約生效，台灣正式從日本分離，依聯合國憲章獨立。

和約第2條b：日本放棄其對於台灣及澎湖群島之一切權利、名義與要求。

工作團隊 台灣國臨時政府 沈建德 作 2004.3.17

China Fabricated Taiwan Question And Fooled Journalists

Cairo Declaration Origin of Taiwan Question Says China Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Li Zhaoxing told the Journalists on March 6, 2004 “if there are still some people who are not clear about the origin of the Taiwan question, I advise them to study the relevant historical documents together with me, which include the Cairo Declaration in 1943, the Potsdam Proclamation in 1945, Resolution 2758 of the UN General Assembly in 1971 and the communiqués on the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and over 160 countries in the world. All theses documents have recognized in most explicit and accurate terms that there is only one China in the world and Taiwan is part of China.” Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao told the Journalists the same thing on March 14, 2004.

Taiwan Response However we studied and found that (1) the Resolution 2758 had nothing to do with the sovereignty of Formosa; (2) the international recognition of Taiwan as a part of China was nothing but modern edition of the Munich Agreement of 1938 betrayed Czechoslovakia for benefits; (3) the Cairo Declaration in the Potsdam Proclamation did not intend to hand over Taiwan to China. The whole story is as follows:

▲China Utilized The Cairo Declaration to Interfere in Taiwan’s Internal Affairs

On September 2, 1945 Japan signed the Instrument of Surrender and accepted the Potsdam Proclamation. In Article 8 it read “the terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out.” But the Cairo Declaration was not found yet China insisted that it was the Press Communique released by Roosevelt, Chiang Kai-shek, and Churchill jointly, on December 1, 1943 in Cairo, Egypt, promising “Manchuria, Formosa, and the Pescadores shall be restored to the Republic of China.” With this, China interfered in Taiwan’s election and plebiscite. Let’s examine its legitimacy.

▲Cairo Declaration (Chinese edition) Is A Fake！Taiwan Question Nonexistent

1. Wrong document: The paper work China insisted is” the Press Communique” (see attachment 1), while the name of the document in Article 8 of Potsdam Proclamation is “the Cairo Declaration.”

2. Not endorsed: Should the Press Communique is the case, it bears no signatures of participants. (see attachment 1)

3. Absentee participants: On December 1, 1943, the day of the release of the Press Communique, none of the participants was in Cairo. Roosevelt and Churchill were in Teheran, Iran meeting with Stalin. (see attachment 2), and Chiang Kai-shek was in Chungking, China. (see attachment 3)

4. Not accepted:: Churchill rejected a suggestion on February 1, 1955 that according to the Cairo Declaration Formosa and the Pescadores be given to China. (see attachment 4)

5. Totally denied: The Cairo Declaration (Chinese edition) stated that Manchuria (the portion of Port Arthur and Dairen) also should be given to China, but Roosevelt and Churchill jointly rejected it by signing the Yalta Agreement and hand them over to Soviet. (see attachment 5)

6. Conclusion: China fabricated the so-called question of Taiwan and fooled the journalists.

▲The Legal Status of Formosa Is As Independent As That of The USA

1. As soon as Formosa was detached from Japan She was entitled to be independent–––– UN Charter.

Article 77b of The UN Charter(1945.6.26): The trusteeship system shall apply to territories which

may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War.

Article 76b of The UN Charter(1945.6.26): The basic objectives of the trusteeship system shall

be ……towards self-government or independence.

2. Formosa Independence was effective on April 28, 1952 as The Peace Treaty with Japan was in force.

Article 2b of the Treaty (signed on September 8, 1951): Japan renounces all right, title and claim

to Formosa and the Pescadores. (Formosa was detached from Japan and independent)

Prepared by Dr. Sim Kiantek, Provisional Government of Formosa 2004.3.17